Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 200%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 182%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics188% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive234% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 21 '22 at 06:34
Run Duration387 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$105
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 93
1-Core 169
2-Core 337
108% 200 Pts
4-Core 663
8-Core 971
102% 817 Pts
64-Core 1,200
74% 1,200 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 108%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
EVGA(3842 4885) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
188% Outstanding
Lighting 274
Reflection 300
Parallax 280
223% 285 fps
MRender 300
Gravity 223
Splatting 171
182% 231 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 188%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$83
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P4CR311 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1419 702 377 288 237 245 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
234% Outstanding
Read 2,177
Write 1,470
Mixed 1,256
SusWrite 545
302% 1,362 MB/s
4K Read 52.6
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 68.9
231% 80.3 MB/s
DQ Read 813
DQ Write 1,066
DQ Mixed 964
721% 947 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 234%
Great: 280%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$80
302GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2361 805 808 812 809 808 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
326% Outstanding
Read 2,688
Write 2,570
Mixed 1,984
SusWrite 1,067
465% 2,077 MB/s
4K Read 70.7
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 100
336% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,327
DQ Write 877
DQ Mixed 1,176
857% 1,127 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 326%
Great: 346%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
382GB free
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1565 849 849 844 850 850 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 1,520
Write 1,758
Mixed 1,284
SusWrite 968
311% 1,382 MB/s
4K Read 53.8
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 81.1
285% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,313
DQ Write 1,067
DQ Mixed 1,168
880% 1,183 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 261%
Great: 276%
WDC WDS1 00T1B0B-00AS40 1TB
222GB free
Firmware: X411
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 299 298 297 295 294 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 416
Write 339
Mixed 252
SusWrite 301
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 88.5
4K Mixed 46.8
147% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 197
156% 217 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$82
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 153 138 152 153 156 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 146
Write 150
Mixed 136
SusWrite 151
108% 146 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.6
467% 4.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 90%
Verbatim STORE N GO 32GB
30GB free, PID 3623
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
5.02% Terrible
Read 14.5
Write 4
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 4.6
8% 7.1 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
30% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.02%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2Z3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
MC Read 42.8
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 38.8
101% 35.2 GB/s
SC Read 31.9
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 37.8
89% 31.2 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 11,134 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $262

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,256
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback