Today's hottest deals

Arcelik GNB-1588-B1-i5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemArcelik GNB-1588-B1-i5  (all builds)
MotherboardQuanta TWD
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 20 '22 at 11:14
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63% Good
Memory 92.9
1-Core 79.2
2-Core 122
63% 98.1 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 196
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 63%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Quanta(152D 1054) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.02% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 6.4
Parallax 2.7
3% 4.3 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.6
3% 3.37 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.02%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biostar S100-120GB 120GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 48 45 37 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 410
Write 62.3
Mixed 105
SusWrite 39.1
33% 154 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 37
4K Mixed 10.9
60% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 98.2
DQ Write 37
DQ Mixed 15.6
25% 50.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1L16BC4R1-B1PS 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
32% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 9.2
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 9.1
28% 9.83 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 32%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GNB-1588-B1-i5 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Arcelik GNB-1588-B1-i5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $52
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback