Today's hottest deals

Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics39.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus EX-A320M-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '22 at 15:47
Run Duration281 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Memory 82.5
1-Core 113
2-Core 226
79% 140 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 612
66% 526 Pts
64-Core 807
50% 807 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
Sapphire(1DA2 E343) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.4% Below average
Lighting 47.1
Reflection 56.7
Parallax 71.8
38% 58.5 fps
MRender 54.3
Gravity 58.8
Splatting 42.1
41% 51.7 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Turbox 128GB 128GB
115GB free
Firmware: 912XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 145 65 66 64 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 432
Write 181
Mixed 211
SusWrite 96.1
51% 230 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 86.4
4K Mixed 23.2
121% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 109
94% 135 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$23
479GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 105 123 133 105 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 157
Write 156
Mixed 110
SusWrite 113
99% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT8G4D30AET4K.M8FE1 BLS8G4D30AESBK.M8FE 16GB
2933, 2933 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
98.5% Outstanding
MC Read 39.7
MC Write 34.7
MC Mixed 33.8
103% 36.1 GB/s
SC Read 25
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 28
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EX-A320M-GAMING Builds (Compare 1,245 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $285
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback