Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-R  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 01 '22 at 07:08
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 45%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$60
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
47.8% Average
Memory 51
1-Core 94.8
2-Core 180
59% 109 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 332
36% 288 Pts
64-Core 248
15% 248 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.8% Poor
Lighting 35.1
Reflection 37.5
Parallax 35.7
29% 36.1 fps
MRender 36.4
Gravity 36.7
Splatting 25.4
26% 32.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot P200 256GB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q1115A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 138 84 77 63 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 341
Write 301
Mixed 27.6
SusWrite 123
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 13.9
4K Mixed 1.2
30% 9.77 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 10.4
DQ Mixed 26.2
29% 52.4 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 3200 C16 Series 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
46.7% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 16.8
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 157
26% 157 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-R Builds (Compare 653 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $315
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback