Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H61M-S2PV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H61M-S2PV  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120621
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '22 at 18:08
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3210-$70
Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-3210 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 84.6
2-Core 156
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 215
29% 216 Pts
64-Core 219
14% 219 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Asus(1043 8400) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 381.89
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.83% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 6.8
Parallax 1.5
4% 4.3 fps
MRender 6.3
Gravity 5
Splatting 3.8
4% 5.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.83%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM11.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 62 48 48 43 54 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.8% Below average
Read 167
Write 47.5
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 50.9
19% 87.9 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 44.5
4K Mixed 19.9
73% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 22.7
DQ Write 89.8
DQ Mixed 34.7
33% 49.1 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 94%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
7GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 11 12 12 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 22.5
Write 5.8
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 11.6
14% 11.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 2.4
158% 3 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
30.1% Below average
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8.9
27% 9.33 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 9
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H61M-S2PV Builds (Compare 1,583 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61M-S2PV - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $193
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback