Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-EX58-EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive76.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-EX58-EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110329
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 23 '22 at 22:48
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5675
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Memory 95.4
1-Core 105
2-Core 212
80% 138 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 662
66% 539 Pts
64-Core 802
50% 802 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250
Zotac(19DA 2103) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
6.92% Terrible
Lighting 9.6
Reflection 11.1
Parallax 3.6
8% 8.1 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 7.5
Splatting 4.2
5% 6.63 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.92%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 134 139 131 136 117 MB/s
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
76.4% Very good
Read 264
Write 253
Mixed 224
SusWrite 147
50% 222 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 71.2
4K Mixed 45.4
155% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 150
125% 181 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 108%
Seagate ST3250312AS 250GB-$59
179GB free
Firmware: HP64
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 114 115 116 114 116 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 120
Write 48.1
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 115
64% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
50.7% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 16.5
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 13.2
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 56
72% 56 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-EX58-EXTREME Builds (Compare 195 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-EXTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $369
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback