Today's hottest deals

Intel NUC7JYB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIntel(R) NUC7CJYH
MotherboardIntel NUC7JYB  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '22 at 14:06
Run Duration273 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4005
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
26.1% Poor
Memory 40.3
1-Core 37
2-Core 71.4
30% 49.6 Pts
4-Core 65.3
8-Core 103
10% 84.2 Pts
64-Core 97.3
6% 97.3 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Intel(8086 2072) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1660
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.07% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 3
Parallax 2.5
2% 2.53 fps
MRender 3.8
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4
3% 3.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.07%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$35
399GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR054
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 241 287 64 235 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 346
Write 350
Mixed 302
SusWrite 189
67% 297 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 56.4
4K Mixed 11.2
71% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 31.4
62% 124 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 92%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB
468GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 49 56 57 56 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
32% Below average
Read 99.4
Write 101
Mixed 59.4
SusWrite 54.7
103% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 32%
Great: 50%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB
1TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 3.5 1.5 0.5 0.9 1.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 63.8
Write 133
Mixed 60
SusWrite 1.7
89% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
41% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 60%
WDC WD15 EARS-00Z5B1 1.5TB
363GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 11 6.7 2.1 3.4 4.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 53.1
Write 54.1
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 5.7
52% 39.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
71% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 31%
WDC WD40 EZRX-22SPEB0 4TB
244GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 6.7 4 0.8 1.3 2.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 72.5
Write 75.3
Mixed 41.4
SusWrite 3.3
60% 48.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
98% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 53%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00WN9B0 4TB
580GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 46 53 57 55 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 87.5
Write 94.4
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 52.8
94% 71.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
98% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 47%
WD Elements 107C 4TB
531GB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 113 127 133 132 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 112
Write 118
Mixed 67.1
SusWrite 124
143% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 60%
ASMT 2105 320GB
28GB free, PID 5136
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 67
Write 68.6
Mixed 46.1
76% 60.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.3% Very poor
MC Read 6.1
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 5.7
18% 6.23 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 3.9
11% 3.73 GB/s
Latency 201
20% 201 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC7JYB Builds (Compare 286 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC7JYB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $23
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback