Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory21.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220225
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 03 '22 at 16:31
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 72.6
1-Core 118
2-Core 227
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 673
50% 450 Pts
64-Core 889
55% 889 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Lighting 141
Reflection 116
Parallax 140
115% 132 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 136
Splatting 110
114% 144 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dierya 1TB 1TB
862GB free
Firmware: Q052
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 237 221 256 280 286 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 362
Write 185
Mixed 242
SusWrite 252
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 9.5
4K Mixed 17.7
65% 17.2 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 53.2
DQ Mixed 24.5
53% 115 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 123%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$75
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 48 37 36 43 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 49.3
Write 15.2
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 42.9
23% 31.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.2
68% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 68%
Hitachi HUA72303 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: MKAO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 24 25 23 22 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 156
Write 18.6
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 23.2
41% 56.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.3
104% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 88%
Toshiba MD05ACA8 8TB
3TB free
Firmware: GX0B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 61 58 67 70 73 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.9% Below average
Read 53.5
Write 79.7
Mixed 38
SusWrite 64.3
43% 58.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 131%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
66.8% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 24.3
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 19.1
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 95.6
42% 95.6 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,024 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $670
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback