Today's hottest deals

To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive41.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180629
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 26 '22 at 14:56
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$79
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
70% Good
Memory 89.3
1-Core 80.7
2-Core 161
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 288
39% 292 Pts
64-Core 307
19% 307 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Asus(1043 83BE) 1GB
CLim: 910 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
9.03% Terrible
Lighting 10.3
Reflection 15.1
Parallax 10.7
8% 12 fps
MRender 15.7
Gravity 11.7
Splatting 11
10% 12.8 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.03%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 147 133 131 137 172 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.2% Average
Read 201
Write 128
Mixed 150
SusWrite 154
36% 158 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 30.6
4K Mixed 19.6
73% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 20.6
DQ Write 38.5
DQ Mixed 25.5
20% 28.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 100%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$88
256GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 121 121 119 121 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 109
Write 111
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 119
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-011.A00LF Micron 16KTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.7% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 8.8
26% 9.27 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 8.9
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,750 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback