Today's hottest deals

Intel X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemIntel X64
MotherboardIntel X79  (all builds)
Memory23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200923
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 22 '22 at 07:18
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 73.4
1-Core 79.9
2-Core 160
61% 104 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 635
54% 466 Pts
64-Core 822
51% 822 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 370 series
PwrHis(1787 2015) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Lighting 23.8
Reflection 31.9
Parallax 30.3
19% 28.7 fps
MRender 26.2
Gravity 21.6
Splatting 21.2
19% 23 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 240GB
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP613PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 221 105 104 104 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 448
Write 340
Mixed 337
SusWrite 165
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 50.1
4K Mixed 28.4
105% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 203
177% 261 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 95%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA640 2TB-$41
125GB free
Firmware: MK7ONS01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 73 75 75 75 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 67
Write 75.2
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 74.8
49% 66.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B4G70DM0- 1x31GB
1 of 4 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
26.5% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 8
24% 8.47 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 7.6
25% 8.87 GB/s
Latency 93.8
43% 93.8 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 2,057 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback