Today's hottest deals

HP G61 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP G61 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardQuanta 363F
Memory0.7 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091010
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMar 23 '22 at 00:02
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Sempron M100
Socket S1G3, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45.4% Average
Memory 86.8
1-Core 28.3
2-Core 22
38% 45.7 Pts
4-Core 27.9
8-Core 27.2
4% 27.5 Pts
64-Core 26
2% 26 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250
HP(103C 363F) 336MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
0.9% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 0.8
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.83 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.1
1% 0.9 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.9%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z320
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 56 53 72 44 67 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 59.9
Write 55.9
Mixed 117
SusWrite 57.4
16% 72.6 MB/s
DQ Read 96.7
DQ Write 19.3
DQ Mixed 6.9
18% 41 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 10
17% 6.95 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 86%
SanDisk Cruzer 8GB
1GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 2.4 2.3 2.6 2.3 2.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
4.39% Terrible
Read 10.7
Write 2.2
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 2.4
6% 5.15 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
52% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.39%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HYMP125S64CP8-S6 HYMP112S64CP6-S6 3GB
800, 800 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
19.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 6.1
16% 5.67 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 1.9
13% 4.43 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G61 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP G61 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $23
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback