MSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics150% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive284% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C35
MotherboardMSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35)  (all builds)
Memory58.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 20 '22 at 14:06
Run Duration272 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$249
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Memory 69.5
1-Core 55.8
2-Core 121
50% 82 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 573
43% 388 Pts
64-Core 2,294
142% 2,294 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$497
Nvidia(10DE 153A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
150% Outstanding
Lighting 219
Reflection 208
Parallax 200
178% 209 fps
MRender 201
Gravity 156
Splatting 136
131% 164 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 150%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$90
296GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2288 2466 1986 846 842 840 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
284% Outstanding
Read 2,572
Write 2,385
Mixed 2,288
SusWrite 1,545
494% 2,197 MB/s
4K Read 59.4
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 66.9
218% 68.5 MB/s
DQ Read 525
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 540
370% 461 MB/s
Poor: 210%
This bench: 284%
Great: 429%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$158
2TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1567 1569 1569 1575 1568 1495 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
268% Outstanding
Read 2273
Write 1,511
Mixed 1,517
SusWrite 1,557
384% 1,715 MB/s
4K Read 52.4
4K Write 81.4
4K Mixed 60.5
200% 64.8 MB/s
DQ Read 528
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 458
336% 444 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 268%
Great: 435%
Lacie 2big RAID 14TB
12.5TB free
Firmware: 1352
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 258 253 253 254 256 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 257
Write 235
Mixed 223
SusWrite 254
180% 242 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 1.9
1,811% 14.4 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 150%
Great: 150%
Lacie Rugged USB-C 4TB
91GB free
Firmware: 1153
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 68 71 71 71 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 51.6
Write 73.4
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 64.2
45% 60.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.2
98% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 69%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: D785
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 177 177 179 180 180 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 139
Write 160
Mixed 83.8
SusWrite 177
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.7
243% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 92%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 126 128 129 129 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 148
Write 139
Mixed 20
SusWrite 128
139% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
40% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB-$127
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 48
MC Write 38.8
MC Mixed 40.5
121% 42.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 29.8
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 109%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35) Builds (Compare 2,521 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35) - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $1,122
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback