Today's hottest deals

MSI 870-C45(FX) V2 (MS-7715)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7715
MotherboardMSI 870-C45(FX) V2 (MS-7715)  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '22 at 18:21
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340
CPU1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 87.1
1-Core 60.7
2-Core 120
56% 89.1 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 356
37% 298 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350
Nvidia(10DE 087E) 1.2GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Lighting 24.5
Reflection 41.2
Parallax 29.4
20% 31.7 fps
MRender 39.6
Gravity 21.8
Splatting 0.2
14% 20.5 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10JUCX-63WPNY0 1TB
773GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 24 12 11 17 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
21.1% Poor
Read 56.7
Write 71.3
Mixed 17.4
SusWrite 16.8
30% 40.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
21% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 64%
Seagate ST9250315AS 250GB-$60
133GB free
Firmware: 0002CE02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 29 18 17 22 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 15.5
Write 14.2
Mixed 14.2
SusWrite 22.2
12% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
74% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 43%
Samsung FIT USB 3.0 64GB-$25
60GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 19 33 33 33 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Read 261
Write 8.2
Mixed 38.4
SusWrite 26.6
72% 83.5 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 14
4K Mixed 1.5
584% 10.3 MB/s
DQ Read 20.6
DQ Write 23.8
DQ Mixed 5.7
1,080% 16.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM 1640 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.2% Below average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 12.8
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 8.5
21% 7.3 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 870-C45(FX) V2 (MS-7715) Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI 870-C45(FX) V2 (MS-7715)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 33% - Below average Total price: $730
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback