Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 8570p

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP EliteBook 8570p  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 17A7
Memory6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20190411
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '22 at 16:42
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Memory 83.5
1-Core 85.9
2-Core 150
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 210
28% 210 Pts
64-Core 213
13% 213 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7500M
HP(103C 17A9) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.301.1003.1003
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
3.87% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 4.2
4% 4.67 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 4
Splatting 4.2
4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.87%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 MAX IOPS 240GB-$160
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 192 180 184 169 173 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 360
Write 221
Mixed 260
SusWrite 184
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 44.5
4K Mixed 26.5
92% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 179
152% 225 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
58.1% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 18.6
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 18.8
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8570p Builds (Compare 457 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8570p

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback