Today's hottest deals

Medion MS-7800

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive41.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMedion MS-7800  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION MS-7800
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit barev, 1280 x 720 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120509
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateDec 19 '21 at 05:40
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 93%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5500 APU-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
43.4% Average
Memory 58
1-Core 58.5
2-Core 91.2
43% 69.2 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 165
22% 167 Pts
64-Core 168
10% 168 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Device(1B0A 90C4) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.1
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.45% Terrible
Lighting 8.2
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 12.8
7% 10.2 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 8.1
Splatting 6.5
6% 7.43 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.45%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssdpr-cl 100-120-G3 120GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T091
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 32 43 43 44 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 177
Write 373
Mixed 221
SusWrite 42.3
46% 203 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 63.2
4K Mixed 20.7
92% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 95.1
DQ Write 82.9
DQ Mixed 1.5
25% 59.8 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$23
168GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 102 101 100 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 97.9
Write 96.9
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 101
65% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
31.7% Below average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 12
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 9.3
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7800 Builds (Compare 134 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Medion MS-7800

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback