Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory3.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191101
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 07 '21 at 10:50
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 77.8
1-Core 108
2-Core 216
75% 134 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 387
53% 393 Pts
64-Core 408
25% 408 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
Device(0000 0000)
Driver: Ver. 10.0.19041.1
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.8% Poor
Lighting 24
Reflection 26.5
Parallax 34.7
20% 28.4 fps
MRender 31.6
Gravity 29.6
Splatting 24.9
23% 28.7 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtuel Microsoft-disk 537GB
462GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 104 113 125 126 124 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.5% Good
Read 104
Write 114
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 113
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.8
170% 1.43 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None 2x3GB
2 of 2 slots used
6GB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
71.1% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 22.7
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 21.1
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,012 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback