Today's hottest deals

Acer Veriton M6670G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive283% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Veriton M6670G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton M6670G
Memory55.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210401
Uptime2 Days
Run DateOct 02 '21 at 15:37
Run Duration322 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 10600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900-$449
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 93.5
1-Core 158
2-Core 283
99% 178 Pts
4-Core 605
8-Core 1,125
103% 865 Pts
64-Core 1,943
120% 1,943 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 103%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$270
Sapphire(174B A520) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 112
Parallax 140
104% 127 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 113
Splatting 107
107% 135 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 104%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00-1014 1TB
838GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11101100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1962 1725 1722 1719 1735 1734 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
283% Outstanding
Read 1,885
Write 2,170
Mixed 1,873
SusWrite 1,766
434% 1,923 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 58
196% 71.9 MB/s
DQ Read 960
DQ Write 775
DQ Mixed 850
641% 861 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 283%
Great: 299%
Seagate ST4000VN008-2DR166 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 214 216 214 216 214 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 195
Write 190
Mixed 85.6
SusWrite 213
125% 171 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.1
646% 4.8 MB/s
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$87
2TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 110 107 111 103 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 125
Write 137
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 110
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$91
435GB free
Firmware: CC4H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 124 122 124 127 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 133
Write 125
Mixed 86
SusWrite 122
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 113%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$28
498GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 87 87 89 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 84.2
Write 77.2
Mixed 57
SusWrite 88
56% 76.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 83%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$87
1TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 116 114 117 115 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
60% Good
Read 94.1
Write 78.3
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 115
62% 85.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 60%
Great: 108%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB
715GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 130 131 130 132 128 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 134
Write 109
Mixed 80
SusWrite 130
150% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
60% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 51%
Great: 71%
ST320006 44NS 2TB
867GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 108 109 109 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 97.9
Write 113
Mixed 65.3
SusWrite 109
132% 96.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 45%
Hitachi HDS5C3030ALA630 3TB
864GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Read 97.2
Write 107
Mixed 61.7
SusWrite 0.3
84% 66.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 42%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA641 3TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 108 109 109 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 127
Write 130
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 109
145% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 54%
WD Elements 25A3 12TB
6TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 183 177 181 177 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 176
Write 179
Mixed 170
SusWrite 180
242% 176 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 1.2
324% 5.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR32D4U2S8ME-16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
94.8% Outstanding
MC Read 34.7
MC Write 37.3
MC Mixed 28.8
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 41.7
SC Mixed 28.6
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 61.1
66% 61.1 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 27" 1280 720 SAM082E SMS27A650
Typical Veriton M6670G Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

System: Acer Veriton M6670G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $629
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback