Today's hottest deals

Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive63.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 29 '21 at 12:54
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Memory 88.2
1-Core 109
2-Core 219
79% 139 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 546
60% 472 Pts
64-Core 552
34% 552 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 6000
HP(103C 076F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 573 MHz, MLim: 747 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 375.86
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Lighting 16.6
Reflection 35.7
Parallax 17.6
14% 23.3 fps
MRender 29.8
Gravity 14.3
Splatting 21.4
18% 21.8 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$23
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR052
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 411 411 207 210 212 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 476
Write 418
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 305
68% 308 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 18.4
4K Mixed 12
51% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 23.8
77% 162 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.7% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 8.2
25% 8.73 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 10
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 33: 4R 3G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
33% 24% 46 149 104 60 27" 1920 1080 PHLC093 273EQH
History: Score 21: 2R 3G 2B | Score 33: 4R 3G 4B
Typical MAXIMUS V FORMULA Builds (Compare 737 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $853
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback