Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics88.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210426
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateSep 02 '21 at 10:54
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User MDA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700-$285
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 89.4
1-Core 184
2-Core 355
112% 210 Pts
4-Core 646
8-Core 1,088
105% 867 Pts
64-Core 1,683
104% 1,683 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 105%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Asus(1043 8623) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.3% Excellent
Lighting 116
Reflection 120
Parallax 120
95% 119 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 97.4
Splatting 111
76% 89.5 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 1TB
300GB free
Firmware: SBFMKA.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 423 425 446 444 449 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 336
Write 122
Mixed 322
SusWrite 435
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 85.9
4K Mixed 38.5
141% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 196
165% 236 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 101%
Colorful CN600 512GB
326GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0707A0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 595 749 591 712 618 1127 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$34
868GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 169 174 174 173 175 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 139
Write 89.9
Mixed 79.9
SusWrite 172
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 113%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$63
717GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 129 134 135 134 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 139
Write 145
Mixed 104
SusWrite 133
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 78%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 3200 8G 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
85.6% Excellent
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 28.5
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 25.3
SC Write 31.8
SC Mixed 27.1
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 4 60 24.1" 1280 720 DELA07A DELL U2412M
Typical TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $443
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback