Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16GN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 12%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.38%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star CR650
MotherboardMSI MS-16GN  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111229
Uptime24 Days
Run DateAug 26 '21 at 10:03
Run Duration383 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-1200 APU
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
9.38% Terrible
Memory 15.2
1-Core 7.8
2-Core 18.2
9% 13.7 Pts
4-Core 21.9
8-Core 18.9
3% 20.4 Pts
64-Core 21.6
1% 21.6 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.38%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7310
MSI(1462 109A) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
0.72% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.4 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.5
1% 0.9 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.72%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 120G 120GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN05999
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 49 30 54 32 64 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.6% Poor
Read 143
Write 153
Mixed 51.6
SusWrite 44
22% 97.7 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 19.8
4K Mixed 9.2
42% 14.1 MB/s
DQ Read 79.3
DQ Write 35.6
DQ Mixed 23.3
26% 46.1 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905603-020.A00G Nanya M2S2G64CB88G5N-CG 6GB
800, 667 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
5.51% Terrible
MC Read 2.7
MC Write 0.9
MC Mixed 1.9
5% 1.83 GB/s
SC Read 1.2
SC Write 1.5
SC Mixed 0.7
3% 1.13 GB/s
Latency 358
11% 358 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 27: 3R 4G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
27% 8% 86 19 13 60 15.5" 1360 768 SEC4141
History: Score 9: 0R 2G 3B | Score 14: 2R 1G 1B | Score 14: 1R 3G 0B | Score 37: 5R 4G 0B | Score 27: 3R 4G 0B
Typical MS-16GN Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16GN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 7% - Terrible Total price: $39
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback