Today's hottest deals

HP p7-1414

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP p7-1414  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory2.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 10 '21 at 01:31
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5500 APU-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
37% Below average
Memory 55.3
1-Core 54.9
2-Core 84.5
40% 64.9 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 94.9
14% 104 Pts
64-Core 152
9% 152 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7560D
HP(103C 2AE0) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1060.0
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
4.01% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 7.8
Parallax 4.9
4% 5.8 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 4
Splatting 6.9
4% 5.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.01%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
765GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 251 222 191 33 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 344
Write 313
Mixed 248
SusWrite 159
60% 266 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 42.1
4K Mixed 25.3
84% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 235
176% 234 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 121%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
782GB free
Firmware: HP16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 171 162 155 182 186 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 144
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 168
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMR5030MM58E8F1600 RMR5040MM58F9F1600 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
20.5% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 7.4
20% 6.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 7.7
17% 6.03 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 29: 5R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
29% 11% 66 16 6 60 0.7" 1920 1080 PHL0000 Philips FTV
Typical p7-1414 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP p7-1414

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $337WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback