Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics20.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 13 '21 at 10:23
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$90
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 77.1
1-Core 149
2-Core 282
91% 169 Pts
4-Core 536
8-Core 874
86% 705 Pts
64-Core 1,097
68% 1,097 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
PwrHis(1787 2320) 1GB
CLim: 910 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Lighting 25.3
Reflection 31.9
Parallax 31.9
21% 29.7 fps
MRender 27.3
Gravity 23.2
Splatting 22.3
20% 24.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M550 mSATA 512GB-$458
329GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 393 385 401 389 388 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 454
Write 460
Mixed 321
SusWrite 392
92% 407 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 94.1
4K Mixed 39.5
145% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 226
194% 281 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$75
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 72 62 71 69 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 49.9
Write 61.9
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 68.5
42% 57 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
22% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 90%
ST5000DM 000-1FK178 5TB
115GB free, PID 2509
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.1 3.9 4.1 3.9 4.3 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Read 31
Write 32.8
Mixed 15.9
SusWrite 4.1
26% 20.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 0.5
254% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 27%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB
821GB free, PID 2509
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 32 32 33 31 33 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 37.7
Write 39.4
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 31.9
48% 35.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron AFLD48FH1P 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
88.4% Excellent
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 35.8
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.3
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 34.9
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P Builds (Compare 2,355 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $636
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback