Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20FVS2ER00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20FVS2ER00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20FVS2ER00
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190502
Uptime10 Days
Run DateJul 03 '21 at 17:12
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
43.9% Average
Memory 51
1-Core 34.6
2-Core 145
41% 76.9 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 169
27% 195 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 5051) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.16% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 6.4
0% 3.97 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 0.1
3% 4.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.16%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SB8U128G1001 128GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4120001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 92 87 84 82 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 316
Write 295
Mixed 211
SusWrite 91.6
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 38.1
4K Mixed 17.4
62% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 345
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 204
176% 262 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HTS 725032A7E630 320GB
298GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 105 104 104 105 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 103
Write 104
Mixed 33.6
SusWrite 105
63% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
53.6% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 18.5
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 15
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 157
26% 157 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 13.9" 1280 720 LEN40A0
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback