Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z590 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive230% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z590 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory38.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210416
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJun 22 '21 at 04:39
Run Duration447 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 65%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700K-$230
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 47.8
1-Core 134
2-Core 273
77% 152 Pts
4-Core 538
8-Core 913
88% 725 Pts
64-Core 1325
82% 1325 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$152
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.3% Average
Lighting 56.3
Reflection 80.5
Parallax 49.3
46% 62 fps
MRender 42.6
Gravity 50.8
Splatting 46.6
38% 46.7 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
787GB free
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 294 266 266 240 266 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 290
Write 323
Mixed 172
SusWrite 250
58% 259 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 46.6
4K Mixed 13.1
49% 21.5 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 242
174% 219 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 117%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$108
350GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1332 1354 1452 1592 1260 1197 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
230% Outstanding
Read 1,186
Write 1,358
Mixed 767
SusWrite 1,364
264% 1,169 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 98.3
4K Mixed 49.3
155% 58 MB/s
DQ Read 1,355
DQ Write 931
DQ Mixed 831
705% 1,039 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 230%
Great: 477%
Hs-ssd-c100 120G 120GB
6GB free
Firmware: S0807A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 394
Write 303
Mixed 157
63% 284 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 14.5
4K Mixed 19
66% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 45.1
DQ Mixed 0.9
34% 88 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 98%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
729GB free
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 308 327 284 302 331 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 154
Write 156
Mixed 147
SusWrite 311
44% 192 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 28.9
4K Mixed 11
44% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 107
86% 122 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 117%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$75
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 162 172 176 166 170 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Read 153
Write 123
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 168
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
393% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 90%
Seagate BUP Portable 4TB
77GB free
Firmware: 1707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 106 106 105 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 80.2
Write 102
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 106
65% 88.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.5
136% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 69%
Amd-raid WDS100T3X0C-00SJ 1TB
456GB free
Firmware: 111110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 283 272 256 256 276 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 22% Great: 353%
JMicron Generic DISK00 4TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 65 94 108 69 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 109
Write 95.7
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 81.5
110% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
72% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 56%
JMicron Generic DISK01 4TB
2.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 68 97 109 72 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 99.2
Write 107
Mixed 61.7
SusWrite 83.8
118% 87.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
70% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 47%
WD My Passport 2627 5TB
185GB free, PID 2627
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 66.3
Write 66.8
Mixed 45.9
SusWrite 20.2
64% 49.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 7.5
4K Mixed 0.7
281% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 65%
JMicron Generic DISK00 1TB
19GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 97 94 100 94 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 92.9
Write 86.3
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 97.9
116% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 60%
JMicron Generic DISK01 4TB
10GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 41 43 57 62 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
26.4% Poor
Read 87.5
Write 102
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 52.2
102% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
37% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 74%
JMicron Generic DISK01 2TB
38GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 87 86 85 85 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.8% Average
Read 135
Write 126
Mixed 79.4
SusWrite 85.3
139% 106 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
116% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 45%
JMicron Generic DISK01 4TB
71GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 71 77 62 61 66 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 154
Write 142
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 68.4
141% 110 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
127% 4.57 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 47%
JMicron Generic DISK00 4TB
65GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 71 76 62 61 66 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 157
Write 121
Mixed 87.7
SusWrite 68.3
137% 108 MB/s
4K Read 9.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.1
124% 4.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 56%
JMicron Generic DISK02 4TB
2.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 26 27 24 24 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 54
Write 68.1
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 25.8
67% 49.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 53%
JMicron Generic DISK03 4TB
2.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 2.2 2.9 1.8 2.1 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
3.66% Terrible
Read 15
Write 16.5
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 3.9
17% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
11% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.66%
Great: 40%
JMicron Generic DISK04 4TB
2.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.96% Terrible
Read 40.2
Write 24.7
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 14.3
32% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
18% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.96%
Great: 33%
JMicron Generic DISK00 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 41 43 57 62 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 112
Write 132
Mixed 91.7
SusWrite 52.3
130% 97 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
47% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-16GTZN Apacer GD2.11299T.001 Skill Intl F4-3200C16-16GTZN Uroad Co Ltd WJD16G8M16P2666 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 16
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 5.7
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 169
24% 169 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 5 240 26.5" 1280 720 GSM5B8E 27GN7
Typical GA-Z590 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 2,452 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z590 AORUS ELITE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $730
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback