Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq dc5850 Small Form Factor

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq dc5850 Small Form Factor  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3029h
Memory1.4 GB free of 4.00098 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080409
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '21 at 12:32
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 91%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 9600B Quad-Core
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
46.1% Average
Memory 71.5
1-Core 33.1
2-Core 65.2
39% 56.6 Pts
4-Core 121
8-Core 134
17% 127 Pts
64-Core 137
8% 137 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon 3100 Graphics
HP(103C 3029) 256MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.73% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.9
1% 0.8 fps
MRender 0.7
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 0.5
1% 0.7 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.73%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 120GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 133 49 52 53 55 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23% Poor
Read 119
Write 67.2
Mixed 76.1
SusWrite 88.1
20% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 16.8
4K Mixed 8.8
41% 13.2 MB/s
DQ Read 10
DQ Write 15.9
DQ Mixed 12.8
10% 12.9 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 23%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 37GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 33792 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
22% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 8.4
21% 7.37 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 5.3
14% 4.97 GB/s
Latency 98
41% 98 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 22%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq dc5850 Small Form Factor Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq dc5850 Small Form Factor

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback