Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Qosmio F60

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Qosmio F60  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101207
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '21 at 10:42
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190
rPGA988A Socket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
33.2% Below average
Memory 56.4
1-Core 26.2
2-Core 38.4
29% 40.3 Pts
4-Core 57.1
8-Core 92.4
9% 74.8 Pts
64-Core 86.7
5% 86.7 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 330M
Toshiba(1179 0001) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
0.73% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 2.2
0% 1.6 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 2.2
2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.73%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
348GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 56 55 51 31 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Read 56
Write 83.8
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 46.5
36% 50 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
92% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 57%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
249GB free, PID a00c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 19 7.7 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 27.3
Write 20
Mixed 16.7
SusWrite 16.5
26% 20.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 4.7
16% 5.53 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 3.6
10% 3.47 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Qosmio F60 Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Qosmio F60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $270
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback