Asus N552VW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus N552VW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N552VW
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '21 at 12:15
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
43.1% Average
Memory 57
1-Core 72.8
2-Core 149
52% 93.1 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 286
27% 222 Pts
64-Core 236
15% 236 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Asus(1043 1D8D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
4.31% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 16.2
Parallax 5
4% 8.73 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 6.9
5% 5.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.31%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 608ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 124 118 128 108 118 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 289
Write 149
Mixed 182
SusWrite 117
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 31
96% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 110
88% 121 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown IND-DDR4-16G 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.7% Poor
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 9.3
30% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 4.3
14% 4.8 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N552VW Builds (Compare 803 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N552VW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback