Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
System
MotherboardIntel DH67BL
Memory5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181023
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJan 10 '21 at 20:55
Run Duration438 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
45.6% Average
Memory 67.4
1-Core 42.6
2-Core 85.9
42% 65.3 Pts
4-Core 131
8-Core 200
20% 165 Pts
64-Core 173
11% 173 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Desktop V2 1.35 GHz)-$15
Intel(8086 2002) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.56% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 1.7
1% 1.87 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 3
2% 2.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.56%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 113 101 117 137 138 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.1% Below average
Read 227
Write 27.2
Mixed 64.8
SusWrite 128
24% 112 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 8.5
53% 12.8 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
188GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 53 52 54 54 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Read 42.7
Write 21.6
Mixed 24.1
SusWrite 54.4
26% 35.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
78% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DHX DDR3 1333 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
30.5% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 9.7
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 6.7
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,042 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback