Today's hottest deals

Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel To be filled by O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190118
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJan 03 '21 at 19:08
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 99.2
2-Core 200
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 493
50% 403 Pts
64-Core 494
31% 494 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8950
AMD(1002 0B01) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.11.3
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.2% Below average
Lighting 40.6
Reflection 34.2
Parallax 52.3
33% 42.4 fps
MRender 29.9
Gravity 39.4
Splatting 23.5
25% 30.9 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS250G2B0A 250GB
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 197 196 193 206 204 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 470
Write 437
Mixed 349
SusWrite 206
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 48.1
4K Mixed 35.3
113% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 282
225% 317 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 105%
Maxtor 6L320S0 320GB
230GB free
Firmware: BACE1G20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 44 44 44 44 44 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Read 49.8
Write 46
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 44.4
31% 42.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.9
216% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Ser 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
56% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 18.5
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 11.4
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical To be filled by O.E.M. Builds (Compare 574 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $65
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback