Today's hottest deals

Asus P7P55D-E PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P7P55D-E PRO  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '20 at 11:57
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 880
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 96.6
1-Core 91.2
2-Core 183
74% 124 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 326
45% 332 Pts
64-Core 282
18% 282 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$270
Nvidia(10DE 13A2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.79
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 115
Parallax 134
106% 127 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 119
Splatting 108
110% 139 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,484
Write 4,987
Mixed 5,119
1,160% 5,196 MB/s
4K Read 527
4K Write 406
4K Mixed 420
1,552% 451 MB/s
DQ Read 1,079
DQ Write 884
DQ Mixed 966
727% 976 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 110%
Seagate ST1000DM 010-2EP102 1TB
799GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 173 174 174 174 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 142
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 173
107% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 105%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
47.8% Average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 13.5
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 14.8
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 51.8
77% 51.8 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7P55D-E PRO Builds (Compare 363 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $284
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback