| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 0.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP Compaq 8000 Elite USDT PC (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 3648h |
| Memory | 0.4 GB free of 2.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores, |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20091022 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 14 '17 at 06:15 |
| Run Duration | 166 Seconds |
| Run User | MEX-User |
| Background CPU | 15% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
35.4%
Below average
|
38% 58.6 Pts
|
9% 69.6 Pts
|
5% 75.2 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel Q45/Q43 Express Chipset
HP(103C 3648) 773MB
Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2869
|
0.5%
Terrible
|
0% 0.57 fps
|
0% 0.55 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba MK8032GS 80GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6B Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
|
12.3%
Very poor
|
17% 21.9 MB/s
|
19% 0.2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown ID:02 FE EBJ21UE8BDS0-DJ-F 38GB
1333, 0 MHz
2048, 36864 MB
|
16.5%
Very poor
|
15% 5.2 GB/s
|
15% 5.13 GB/s
|
31% 130 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Compaq 8000 Elite USDT PC Builds (Compare 51 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Compaq 8000 Elite USDT PC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Duo E8400Intel $53Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 25x |
| Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples | 11x |
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 4x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 16,152 samples | 48x |
| GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples | 1x |
| Radeon R7 240AMDBench 4%, 2,991 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $53 |