Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3397
Memory9.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '20 at 22:35
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$69
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 98.5
2-Core 196
71% 125 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 368
50% 370 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.4% Poor
Lighting 37.2
Reflection 41.3
Parallax 38.4
30% 39 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 38.7
Splatting 27.4
28% 34.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 128GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM13.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 73 69 93 126 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 471
Write 395
Mixed 334
SusWrite 100
72% 325 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 36
4K Mixed 23.7
82% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 265
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 97.5
122% 215 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 93%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 319GB
297GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 107 107 109 110 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 109
Write 100
Mixed 66.9
SusWrite 105
70% 95.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 62%
Seagate ST9160821AS 160GB-$60
146GB free
Firmware: 0104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 28 28 29 29 28 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 29.9
Write 22.8
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 28
18% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HU554304EP0200 Kingston 9905458-020.A00LF Samsung M378B5773CH0-CK0 Kingston 9905458-020.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.1% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.5
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 SFF Builds (Compare 5,565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback