CKE PowerServer X-series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	18.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	CKE PowerServer X-series (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9SRA/X9SRA-3
Memory	27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201101
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Nov 25 '20 at 11:54
Run Duration	339 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2660 0 1,318 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	62.5% Good	Memory 73.2 1-Core 47.4 2-Core 109 48% 76.6 Pts	4-Core 280 8-Core 494 47% 387 Pts	64-Core 723 45% 723 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 71%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD 128GB-$84 8,513 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.0.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 22 31 32 16 21 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	18.4% Very poor	Read 237 Write 45.3 Mixed 2 SusWrite 25 16% 77.3 MB/s	4K Read 12.3 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 3.5 26% 6.97 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 56%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 1TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 124% 398GB free Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 318 450 452 452 451 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	138% Outstanding	Read 1,656 Write 441 Mixed 709 SusWrite 362 173% 792 MB/s	4K Read 52.1 4K Write 20.5 4K Mixed 28.3 126% 33.6 MB/s	DQ Read 302 DQ Write 216 DQ Mixed 220 175% 246 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 138% Great: 165%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 1TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 124% 927GB free Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 449 450 448 449 447 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	143% Outstanding	Read 1,626 Write 436 Mixed 714 SusWrite 448 177% 806 MB/s	4K Read 50.8 4K Write 27.5 4K Mixed 32.9 134% 37.1 MB/s	DQ Read 294 DQ Write 178 DQ Mixed 185 152% 219 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 143% Great: 165%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 2TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 2TB free Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 134 131 138 136 148 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	95% Outstanding	Read 1,151 Write 173 Mixed 212 SusWrite 139 90% 419 MB/s	4K Read 52.2 4K Write 13.1 4K Mixed 14.3 104% 26.5 MB/s	DQ Read 275 DQ Write 211 DQ Mixed 212 167% 232 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 95% Great: 115%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB 13,833 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 391GB free Firmware: MJ8OA5F0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 132 133 132 134 134 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	72.7% Very good	Read 120 Write 144 Mixed 74.3 SusWrite 133 86% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 152% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 89%
WL4000GSA6472B 4TB 111 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 188GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 94 103 96 99 75 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	53.7% Above average	Read 93.6 Write 71.6 Mixed 53.9 SusWrite 93.7 57% 78.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.3 73% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 96%
Seagate Expansion+ 4TB 2,051 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2TB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 122 121 118 118 119 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	59.4% Above average	Read 88.8 Write 111 Mixed 63.8 SusWrite 118 70% 95.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 0.2 101% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 68%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 2TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 55GB free Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 76 76 76 76 74 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	62.4% Good	Read 138 Write 18.7 Mixed 47.9 SusWrite 78 52% 70.5 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 0.5 262% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 62%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 2TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 386GB free Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 86 51 76 86 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	75% Very good	Read 179 Write 14 Mixed 66.8 SusWrite 80.6 63% 85.1 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 0.5 267% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 62%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 2TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2TB free Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 34 34 40 36 34 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 8% Great: 68%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 2,304 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 55GB free, PID 0210 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 60 61 60 60 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	26.8% Poor	Read 55.3 Write 59.9 Mixed 29.8 SusWrite 60.4 70% 51.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70CH0- 4x8GB 322 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	MC Read 38.5 MC Write 36.4 MC Mixed 33.4 103% 36.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 6.8 25% 8.7 GB/s	Latency 94.1 42% 94.1 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

CKE PowerServer X-series

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)