ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus CROSSHAIR II FORMULA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	15.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus CROSSHAIR II FORMULA (all builds)
Memory	6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110208
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 28 '15 at 02:14
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340 12,769 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 4 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 73.1 2-Core 144 49% 108 Pts	4-Core 287 8-Core 427 44% 357 Pts	64-Core 437 27% 437 Pts
Poor: 51% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203 31,648 User benchmarks, average bench 12% MSI(1462 2322) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5362 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	15.6% Very poor	Lighting 17.9 Reflection 21 Parallax 16 15% 18.3 fps	MRender 24.8 Gravity 18.9 Splatting 21.3 18% 21.6 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 4742484 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 76055280877779 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 173 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 90 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 28 40 90196934684 (C2) HDA temperature 28 40 90196934684 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 4742484 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 4742484 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 4742484 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 8589934592 (E9) Unknown 0 0 1100 (EA) Unknown 0 0 847 (F1) Unknown 0 0 847 (F2) Unknown 0 0 775 (F4) Unknown 100 100 2686997	41.8% Average	Read 204 Write 112 Mixed 143 34% 153 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 68.7 4K Mixed 10.5 84% 34 MB/s	DQ Read 27.2 DQ Write 98.7 DQ Mixed 12.3 24% 46.1 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 73%
Kingston SV300S37A120G 750GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 371GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 91 91 3760 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4205 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 12959 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4163 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 2 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 59 421068825 (C2) HDA temperature 75 57 421068825 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 117276 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 1 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	30.8% Below average	Read 94.2 Write 13 Mixed 21.8 32% 43 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 0.44 4K Mixed 0.22 58% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical CROSSHAIR II FORMULA Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR II FORMULA

CPU
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	3x
Phenom II X4 940AMDBench 49%, 3,675 samples	2x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 6770AMDBench 10%, 16,639 samples	2x
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	2x
GTX 480Nvidia $500Bench 20%, 3,874 samples	1x

SSD
Premier Pro SP900 128GBAdata $40Bench 69%, 2,820 samples	2x
SSDNow SNV Series 128GBKingstonBench 20%, 1,098 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	5x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $215

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback