Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	39.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel 23 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	64.3% Good	Memory 66.7 1-Core 92 2-Core 179 63% 113 Pts	4-Core 332 8-Core 668 59% 500 Pts	64-Core 1,646 102% 1,646 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.3.3 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	39.6% Below average	Lighting 40.6 Reflection 69.3 Parallax 94.8 33% 68.2 fps	MRender 69.6 Gravity 66.7 Splatting 58.1 52% 64.8 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 56%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
View REAL-240GB 240GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 171GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0317A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 99 7.6 99 16 80 MB/s Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29.5% Poor	Read 216 Write 178 Mixed 179 SusWrite 75.1 36% 162 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 27.1 4K Mixed 0.3 44% 15.5 MB/s	DQ Read 49.9 DQ Write 159 DQ Mixed 0.5 30% 69.9 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Team-Elite-16 4x2GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 4 of 16 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	79.4% Very good	MC Read 36.5 MC Write 32.1 MC Mixed 29.1 93% 32.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 4.6 20% 7.07 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 87%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	7x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v21stBench 58%, 1,402 samples	6x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 66%, 741 samples	6x

RAM
M393B2G70BH0- 8x16GBSamsungBench 92%, 52 samples	6x
M393B1K70QB0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 96%, 634 samples	3x
M393B2G70QH0- 16x16GBSamsungBench 99%, 14 samples	3x

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $59