Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	59.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420 65,927 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	65.6% Good	Memory 82.9 1-Core 87.3 2-Core 147 64% 106 Pts	4-Core 262 8-Core 426 42% 344 Pts	64-Core 420 26% 420 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660M 7,381 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Asus(1043 2115) 2GB CLim: 950 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 425.31 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	8.08% Terrible	Lighting 8.97 Reflection 8.42 Parallax 10.6 7% 9.33 fps	MRender 12.2 Gravity 10.8 Splatting 12 10% 11.7 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.08% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70 27,495 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: 507KC4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 185 181 85 85 72 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	59.4% Above average	Read 371 Write 213 Mixed 212 SusWrite 134 52% 232 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 37.7 4K Mixed 24.5 83% 27.6 MB/s	DQ Read 273 DQ Write 209 DQ Mixed 155 139% 212 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 94%
Samsung 850 EVO 500GB (TurboPC EX) 12 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 79GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 432 438 441 433 434 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 457 Write 438 Mixed 385 SusWrite 435 97% 429 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 61.8 4K Mixed 45.2 139% 46.2 MB/s	DQ Read 365 DQ Write 324 DQ Mixed 335 254% 341 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 119%
SanDisk Cruzer Switch 32GB 1,758 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 20GB free, PID 5572 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	7.4% Terrible	Read 22.5 Write 15.2 Mixed 11.3 SusWrite 4.9 16% 13.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 2.4 120% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.4% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 16GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.1% Below average	MC Read 13.5 MC Write 10.3 MC Mixed 10.8 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 12.6 36% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 75.4 53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

GPU
GTX 660MNvidiaBench 7%, 7,381 samples	343x
GTX 670MNvidiaBench 10%, 2,951 samples	278x
GeForce GTX 770NvidiaBench 9%, 2 samples	1x

SSD
LAT-256M3S 256GBLiteonitBench 75%, 575 samples	30x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	14x

RAM
EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 2x4GBElpidaBench 48%, 3,420 samples	66x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 53%, 1,421 samples	61x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples	48x

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $300