Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault SCHNEIDER
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200515
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '20 at 02:49
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J3455
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Memory 30.5
1-Core 43.9
2-Core 86.5
30% 53.6 Pts
4-Core 150
8-Core 168
21% 159 Pts
64-Core 146
9% 146 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500
Device(1E50 8004) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8587
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.13% Terrible
Lighting 2.07
Reflection 2.42
Parallax 2.38
2% 2.29 fps
MRender 0.1
Gravity 0.1
Splatting 0.04
0% 0.08 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.13%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ShanDianZhe-128GB 128GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1231A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 63 62 75 62 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 343
Write 278
Mixed 268
SusWrite 97.5
55% 247 MB/s
4K Read 9.6
4K Write 8.3
4K Mixed 0.6
20% 6.17 MB/s
DQ Read 67.4
DQ Write 12.6
DQ Mixed 23.2
21% 34.4 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 64%
SDXC Card 64GB
56GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 24.8
Write 19
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 18.9
27% 20.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.1
73% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
25.3% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 9.7
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 3
9% 3.1 GB/s
Latency 252
16% 252 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 15,491 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback