HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3396
Memory5.6 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120507
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateAug 28 '20 at 04:50
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 78
1-Core 96.1
2-Core 189
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 323
44% 330 Pts
64-Core 338
21% 338 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 397.64
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Lighting 38.4
Reflection 29.9
Parallax 36.1
31% 34.8 fps
MRender 37.5
Gravity 37.3
Splatting 34.7
30% 36.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
683GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 35 46 82 83 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 99.7
Write 97.8
Mixed 25
SusWrite 63.6
52% 71.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
55% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 109%
WD My Passport 0810 1TB
880GB free, PID 0810
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 72 72 72 72 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 65.3
Write 28.5
Mixed 32
SusWrite 69.3
63% 48.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
43% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 45%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB
616GB free, PID ce17
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 37 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 40
Write 34.5
Mixed 35
SusWrite 38.6
50% 37 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
96% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 21%
CENTON DS Pro 4GB
3GB free, PID 0000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.5 2.6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.39% Terrible
Read 21.5
Write 1.8
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 2.5
6% 7.07 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
27% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.39%
Great: 7%
ST330083 1A 300GB
279GB free, PID 0500
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
5.09% Terrible
Read 5.5
Write 9.8
Mixed 6
SusWrite 14.9
13% 9.05 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
22% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.09%
Great: 15%
BUFFALO External HDD 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0257
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 96 94 96 94 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 170
Write 136
Mixed 79
SusWrite 94.7
153% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 51%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 Kingston 9905471-074.A00LF 14GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.4% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 10.5
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 8
25% 8.7 GB/s
Latency 84.3
47% 84.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 CMT Builds (Compare 2,781 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback