Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20289

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20289  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Plum 5A
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131015
Uptime14.8 Days
Run DateAug 05 '20 at 01:10
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4500U-$393
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
55.4% Above average
Memory 88.2
1-Core 83.1
2-Core 137
64% 103 Pts
4-Core 126
8-Core 188
20% 157 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3800) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
1.22% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 0.08
Parallax 5.47
0% 1.87 fps
MRender 4.14
Gravity 2.13
Splatting 5.83
4% 4.03 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.22%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2013)-$62
471GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 23 24 30 20 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Read 82.7
Write 90.4
Mixed 55.2
SusWrite 23.8
47% 63 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 63%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
494GB free
Firmware: 0911
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Read 32.4
Write 28.5
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 29.4
22% 29.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 103%
WD Elements 25A1 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 77 78 78 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 127
Write 110
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 77.5
118% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 0.6
250% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 56%
Great: 61%
Kingston SNA-DC/U 320GB
225GB free, PID 6298
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 3.7 9.2 2.6 2.8 8.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 35.4
Write 36.4
Mixed 26.4
SusWrite 5.3
33% 25.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11%
Great: 20%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
157GB free, PID 0200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 85 87 87 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 66.3
Write 71.1
Mixed 30.1
SusWrite 86.6
86% 63.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
31.3% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 8.5
28% 9.87 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 9.6
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20289 Builds (Compare 120 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20289

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback