Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H67-M LE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M LE  (all builds)
Memory7.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130912
Uptime4 Days
Run DateJul 27 '20 at 05:54
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 80.3
2-Core 177
65% 112 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 299
41% 304 Pts
64-Core 326
20% 326 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
MSI(1462 8A9F) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 405 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
3.83% Terrible
Lighting 4.77
Reflection 5.27
Parallax 3.84
4% 4.63 fps
MRender 6.19
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 3.26
4% 4.75 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.83%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$56
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.06H05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 45 46 48 48 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
30.1% Below average
Read 57.2
Write 57.1
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 47.1
38% 51.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 59%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
177GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 58.1
Mixed 35.5
36% 46.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-009.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
44.9% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 14
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 13.2
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M LE Builds (Compare 549 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $104
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback