Today's hottest deals

Samsung 550P5C/550P7C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.63% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive87.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemSamsung 550P5C/550P7C  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP550P7C-S03RU
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141024
Uptime9.6 Days
Run DateJul 12 '20 at 05:27
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 86.4
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 177
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 347
46% 346 Pts
64-Core 263
16% 263 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 650M
Sanyo(144D C0D1) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6839
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
7.63% Terrible
Lighting 9.03
Reflection 7.77
Parallax 9.28
7% 8.69 fps
MRender 9.14
Gravity 8.37
Splatting 11.6
8% 9.71 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.63%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-256M7VC 256GB
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 261 240 231 238 237 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 485
Write 310
Mixed 393
SusWrite 254
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 39.1
128% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 245
193% 265 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 103%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
728GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 170 165 176 176 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 120
Write 134
Mixed 66
SusWrite 171
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
194% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-063.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
57.8% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 17.9
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 16.2
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 550P5C/550P7C Builds (Compare 616 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 550P5C/550P7C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $445
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback