Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory61.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 08 '20 at 13:50
Run Duration341 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
None, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.1% Average
Memory 40.8
1-Core 67.9
2-Core 137
44% 82 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 478
42% 355 Pts
64-Core 1,416
88% 1,416 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 150GB
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 124 121 109 140 134 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 37% Great: 71%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 107GB
100GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 150 150 151 153 153 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 36% Great: 90%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 730 777 747 736 736 710 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Microsoft Virtual Disk 268GB
250GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 401 332 369 404 331 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 38% Great: 90%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 150GB
140GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 739 734 732 739 747 758 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 37% Great: 71%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 107GB
85GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 407 333 368 404 332 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 36% Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None Corporation None Corporation None 64GB
0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
3968, 28800, 32128, 640 MB
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
MC Read 42.5
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 34.4
101% 35.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 6.2
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 198
20% 198 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,921 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback