Today's hottest deals

HP h8-1070t

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP h8-1070t  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AB5
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110706
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJul 04 '20 at 21:26
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$173
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 99.8
2-Core 184
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 472
53% 418 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 530
Device(1B0A 90A3) 2GB
CLim: 699 MHz, MLim: 396 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.51% Terrible
Lighting 4.33
Reflection 5
Parallax 3.56
4% 4.3 fps
MRender 5.86
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.09
4% 4.41 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.51%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
541GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JKAOA3GB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 57 47 56 47 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 58
Write 91.7
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 50.9
45% 61.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
147% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 69%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$79
59GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 96 98 101 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 71.9
Write 72.4
Mixed 64
SusWrite 96.8
56% 76.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 67%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$80
458GB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 131 130 124 133 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 93.1
Write 64.5
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 120
62% 85 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 96%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 6.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
8.72% Terrible
Read 32.2
Write 25.1
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 2.3
26% 21.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
60% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.72%
Great: 62%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
8.53% Terrible
Read 32
Write 25.1
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 1.6
26% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
60% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.53%
Great: 62%
HGST HDN 726060ALE610 6TB
4.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 24 24 24 25 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 25.4
Mixed 25.6
SusWrite 23.7
35% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.1
85% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BD160BJ.M8F Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 CT51264BD160B.C16F Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.8% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 16.6
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical h8-1070t Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP h8-1070t

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $313
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback