Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PH517-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics79.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive57.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Predator PH517-51  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Cayman_CFS
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 25 '20 at 14:49
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Memory 92.7
1-Core 127
2-Core 251
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 744
77% 619 Pts
64-Core 883
55% 883 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1243) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
79.6% Very good
Lighting 97.2
Reflection 113
Parallax 92.8
79% 101 fps
MRender 97.1
Gravity 98
Splatting 98.8
80% 98 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GB
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MA020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 151 153 155 155 154 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 385
Write 154
Mixed 166
SusWrite 154
47% 215 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 73.3
4K Mixed 16.9
88% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 144
112% 153 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 91%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: ACM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 132 134 130 131 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 122
Write 104
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 131
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9D8MD-16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 34.6
MC Mixed 27.4
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 37.1
SC Mixed 27.8
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PH517-51 Builds (Compare 607 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

System: Acer Predator PH517-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback