Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-1771

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star GS70 2OD
MotherboardMSI MS-1771  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '20 at 20:06
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 87.3
1-Core 99.3
2-Core 193
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 505
52% 418 Pts
64-Core 504
31% 504 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
MSI(1462 10EE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.94% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 14.8
Parallax 7
3% 8.65 fps
MRender 7.43
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 8.13
5% 6.01 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.94%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
347GB free
Firmware: UG4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 24 3.3 126 4.3 219 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 434
Write 346
Mixed 219
SusWrite 92.2
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 34.8
4K Mixed 11.1
65% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 87.7
DQ Mixed 27.4
41% 77.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 61%
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 250GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT41B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 263 308 309 305 310 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 464
Mixed 384
SusWrite 313
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 72.8
4K Mixed 48.7
162% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 358
270% 360 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 106%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M2S4G64CC88B4N-DI 1311 M2S8G64CC8HB5N-DI 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 8.8
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 10
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-1771 Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1771

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback