Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire 5741Z

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire 5741Z  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire 5741Z
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110425
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '20 at 12:08
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 380-$130
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
45.9% Average
Memory 67.7
1-Core 60.3
2-Core 110
49% 79.2 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 154
19% 147 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Acer(1025 036D) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.85% Terrible
Lighting 0.87
Reflection 1.12
Parallax 0.84
1% 0.94 fps
MRender 1.38
Gravity 0.67
Splatting 1.91
1% 1.32 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.85%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vaseky V800/64GB 60GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0922A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 169 27 14 22 22 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.7% Poor
Read 190
Write 197
Mixed 6
SusWrite 44.1
24% 109 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 1
26% 7.73 MB/s
DQ Read 75
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 0.3
35% 82.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 63%
Generic- Multi-Card 32GB
30GB free, PID 0159
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 18.2
Write 17.7
Mixed 17.6
SusWrite 17.9
24% 17.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 2.7
184% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5773CHS-CH9 M471B5673FH0-CH9 4GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
24.1% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 9.9
23% 8.13 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 5741Z Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 5741Z

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback