Today's hottest deals

Lenovo ThinkSystem SR655 -[7Z01CTO1WW]-

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive346% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo ThinkSystem SR655 -[7Z01CTO1WW]-  (all builds)
MotherboardLNVO System Board
Memory251.4 GB free of 256 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1280x1024x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191111
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 28 '20 at 04:17
Run Duration273 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7502P 32-Core
CPU1, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Memory 48.4
1-Core 87.7
2-Core 175
56% 104 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 702
62% 526 Pts
64-Core 3,559
220% 3,559 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lenovo RAID 730-8i 2GB
826GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.68
SusWrite @10s intervals: 605 497 496 496 498 497 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
346% Outstanding
Read 3,976
Write 4,069
Mixed 4,024
SusWrite 515
705% 3,146 MB/s
4K Read 130
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 127
427% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 534
DQ Write 502
DQ Mixed 491
376% 509 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 346%
Great: 346%
MZQLB1T9HAJR-000V3 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: CK32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2092 2085 2084 2081 2084 2050 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
341% Outstanding
Read 2,408
Write 1,980
Mixed 1,485
SusWrite 2,079
446% 1,988 MB/s
4K Read 49.5
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 72.4
247% 90.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,155
DQ Write 685
DQ Mixed 855
654% 899 MB/s
MZQLB1T9HAJR-000V3 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: CK32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2093 2084 2082 2085 2081 2042 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
343% Outstanding
Read 2,424
Write 1,978
Mixed 1,472
SusWrite 2,078
446% 1,988 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 72.5
248% 91.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,186
DQ Write 708
DQ Mixed 886
676% 927 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A4K40DB2-CWE 8x31.9GB
8 of 16 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
199% Outstanding
MC Read 72.6
MC Write 66
MC Mixed 109
236% 82.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 33.1
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 167
24% 167 ns
Poor: 199%
This bench: 199%
Great: 249%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback