Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DH55HC
Memory8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111206
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJan 24 '20 at 21:03
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$40
XU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Memory 68.5
1-Core 72.1
2-Core 128
54% 89.5 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 188
26% 190 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)
Intel(8086 0036) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.89% Terrible
Lighting 0.97
Reflection 1.23
Parallax 0.91
1% 1.03 fps
MRender 1.48
Gravity 0.73
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.89%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB6S-256G-1006 256GB
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X3511006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 167 164 175 173 173 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.5% Below average
Read 171
Write 169
Mixed 136
SusWrite 167
36% 161 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 29
4K Mixed 19.4
59% 20.3 MB/s
DQ Read 23
DQ Write 56.6
DQ Mixed 28.5
25% 36 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 94%
Samsung HD250HJ 250GB
76GB free
Firmware: FH100-06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 62 63 64 64 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 71.2
Write 77
Mixed 47
SusWrite 63.5
48% 64.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 56%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
178GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 62 63 64 64 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 49.2
Write 48.9
Mixed 34.6
SusWrite 63.6
36% 49.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 51%
Samsung HD251HJ 250GB-$39
14GB free
Firmware: 1AC01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 48 49 49 49 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 69
Write 33.5
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 48.4
37% 50.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 53%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
199GB free
Firmware: KC65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 88 87 88 89 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 99
Write 95.2
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 88.5
61% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 88%
ASMT 2115 256GB
48GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 23 20 24 21 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
29% Poor
Read 26.2
Write 21
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 21.8
31% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 5.9
434% 6.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29%
Great: 225%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-011.A00LF Corsair CMY8GX3M2A1600C9 9905471-011.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.4% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 10
24% 8.53 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 4.8
14% 4.83 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,986 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback