Today's hottest deals

Foxconn Quantumian1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemFoxconn Quantumian1  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN X79A01
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130121
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 11 '16 at 14:47
Run Duration391 Seconds
Run User KAZ-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
LGA 2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 95.9
1-Core 113
2-Core 222
83% 143 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 502
54% 430 Pts
64-Core 544
34% 544 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
Palit(1569 100A) 3GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 376.19
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52% Above average
Lighting 64.4
Reflection 61.8
Parallax 78.4
52% 68.2 fps
MRender 73.2
Gravity 69.8
Splatting 49.5
51% 64.2 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 52%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370S 256GB-$110
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O0919A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 511
Write 456
Mixed 472
107% 480 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 56.2
4K Mixed 23.1
98% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 13.4
50% 112 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 85%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST31000333AS 1TB-$170
214GB free
Firmware: CC1H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 91.6
Write 77.5
Mixed 86.3
64% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.27
4K Mixed 0.33
80% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 66%
Seagate ST3400620AS 400GB-$55
205GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 62.1
Write 54.6
Mixed 60.3
44% 59 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.31
84% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 42%
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 16GB
15GB free, PID 556b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
7.1% Terrible
Read 21.1
Write 3.47
Mixed 13.6
14% 12.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.59
4K Write 0.71
4K Mixed 1.21
82% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.1%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL11-13-13 D3 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
69.8% Good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 23.1
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 14.6
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 54.4
74% 54.4 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Quantumian1 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

System: Foxconn Quantumian1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback