bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory56GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 56GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory49 GB free of 56 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, , ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190619
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateNov 20 '19 at 20:44
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6152
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 75.6
1-Core 107
2-Core 209
73% 130 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 626
65% 523 Pts
64-Core 615
38% 615 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID P100C-4Q
Nvidia(10DE 1268) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.79
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.3% Very poor
Lighting 20.6
Reflection 23.8
Parallax 19.3
17% 21.2 fps
MRender 29.5
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 26.9
21% 25.7 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Citrix Virtual Disk 129GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PVS
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 2,440
Write 2,248
Mixed 2,327
522% 2,338 MB/s
4K Read 90
4K Write 98.5
4K Mixed 98.6
315% 95.7 MB/s
DQ Read 79.9
DQ Write 76
DQ Mixed 77.4
58% 77.8 MB/s
Vmware Virtual disk 34GB
28GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 141 149 145 145 143 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 455
Write 229
Mixed 332
SusWrite 143
64% 290 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 11.8
4K Mixed 11.8
45% 13 MB/s
DQ Read 13.1
DQ Write 11.2
DQ Mixed 11.8
9% 12 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB Virtual RAM VMW-8192MB 56GB
0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 58.1
MC Write 37.5
MC Mixed 47.3
136% 47.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 9
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 115%
Great: 257%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,548 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback